Skip to content Smaller textLarger text

Topic Page:

Public Ownership

public ownership, government ownership of lands, streets, public buildings, utilities, and other business enterprises. The theory that all land and its resources belong ultimately to the people and therefore to the government is very ancient. From it comes the doctrine of eminent domain, asserting that the state has ultimate control over lands and buildings within its borders. Until the policy of laissez faire in the 18th cent. emphasized capitalistic activity, public ownership was unquestioned. In ancient times governments owned and conducted many enterprises, such as water systems, theaters, and baths. In the United States, government units own and manage the public school system, public highways and bridges, dams for the reclamation of land and for power (and the management and sale of power), and many other enterprises. The Tennessee Valley Authority is an example of public ownership. The importance of public utilities to the life of the community has frequently led to municipal ownership of water, sewerage, electric light, power, gas, and transportation systems. In Europe, where public ownership is more extensive and of longer standing than in the United States, it includes railroads, telephone and telegraph lines, and radio and television and was extended to coal mining, other power resources, and banking. Since World War II many Western nations have practiced public ownership of business enterprises through public corporations such as Amtrak. Public ownership was practiced most extensively in the USSR and other Communist countries, where government owned almost all land and all natural resources, and where nearly all industries were carried on by state institutions. The extent of public ownership contracted in the 1980s and 90s, however, in Britain, France, Eastern Europe, and the former Soviet nations (see nationalization). Many developing countries also have large-scale public ownership, especially of vital industries and resources. Public ownership is to be distinguished from government control of private enterprises in utilities, business, and agriculture. In the United States such control has been increased through loans, direct financing, and laws providing for the government's regulation of corporate activities.

Columbia University Press The Columbia Encyclopedia, © Columbia University Press 2013


APA | Chicago | Harvard | MLA

 
Journal articles, books, images, news and more.
Click to scroll to additional content.

IMAGES FROM CREDO

Eugene V. Debs and the American Socialist Party...V. I. Lenin triumphantly led the Bolsheviks...
  • RELATED TOPIC PAGES
  • RECENTLY VISITED

REFERENCES

  • Boos, Dieter, Public Enterprise Economics: Theory and Application, Amsterdam and New York: North Holland, 1986.
  • De Alessi, Louis, “The Economics of Property Rights: A Review of the Evidence” in Research in Law and Economics: A Research Annual, edited by Zerbe, Jr, Richard O., vol. 2, Greenwich, Connecticut: Jai Press, 1980.
  • Estrin, Saul; Virginie Pérotin, “Does Ownership Always Matter?”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 9/1 (1991): 55-72.
  • Foster, Christopher D., Privatization, Public Ownership. and the Regulation of Natural Monopoly, Oxford and Cambridge, Massachusetts: Blackwell, 1992.
  • Gathon, Henry-Jean; Pierre Pestieau, “La Performance des entreprises publiques: une question de propriété ou de concurrence?”, Revue Economique, 47/6 (1996): 1225-38.

From Credo

  • Grossman, Sanford J.; Oliver D. Hart, “The Costs and Benefits of Ownership: A Theory of Vertical and Lateral Integration”, Journal of Political Economy, 94/4 (1986): 691-719.
  • Hart, Oliver D.; John D. Moore, “Property Rights and the Nature of the Firm”, Journal of Political Economy, 98/6 (1990): 1119-58.
  • Megginson, William; Robert Nash; Matthias van Randenborgh, “The Financial and Operating Performance of Newly Privatized Firms: An International Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Finance, 49/2 (1994): 403-51.
  • Millward, Robert; John Singleton (editors), The Political Economy of Nationalisation in Britain, 1920-1950, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.
  • Ott, Attiat F.; Keith Hartley, (editors), Privatization and Economic Efficiency: A Comparative Analysis of Developed and Developing Countries, Aldershot, Hampshire: Elgar, 1991.
  • Shleifer, Andrei, “State versus Private Ownership”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12/4 (1998): 133-50.
  • Zeckhauser, Richard J.; Murray Horn, “The Control and Performance of State-Owned Enterprises” in Privatizations and State-Owned Enterprises: Lessons from the United States, Great Britain and Canada, edited by MacAvoy, Paul W. et al., Boston and London: Kluwer, 1989.